The setting: McDonalds
Me: What meat is in your chicken nuggets?
Ben: Huh?
Me: Are you eating chicken?
Ben: (laughs) No! We don't eat animals. We eat food!
Of course, it could've been a comment about the meat content (or lack of) in Mcdonalds.....
Monday 25 April 2011
Wednesday 20 April 2011
Pop Post Chart
Just been looking at my blog stats, and since I started in 2007 the most popular posts have been:-
Things to know about Norwich (22/09/2009)
Thomas and his Friends Day & Bressingham Steam Museum (20/08/2007)
I'm reliably informed (09/09/2010)
Triple-decker bus! (30/05/2009)
I obvioulsy haven't written anything of great interest this year because no article has made the top ten yet.
Things to know about Norwich (22/09/2009)
Thomas and his Friends Day & Bressingham Steam Museum (20/08/2007)
I'm reliably informed (09/09/2010)
Triple-decker bus! (30/05/2009)
I obvioulsy haven't written anything of great interest this year because no article has made the top ten yet.
Tuesday 19 April 2011
Why Charities are important
Charity - defined as the practice of benevolent giving and caring
The British nation has always been big on charity. For a nation of high taxes, in the main most people still give to charity on a regular basis.
In 2007/8 charity donations peaked at £11.3 billion from the British public. Although it came down a bit in 2008/9 (still £10.6 billion) the figure for 2010 is expected to be close to the peak, and in 2011 it will probably be even higher.
I'm experiencing the generosity of my fellow citizens right now as I raise funds via a sponsored walk.
Of course, not everyone has been able to donate, but they have wished me well with the event and their good wishes are invaluable too. Indeed there are many valid reasons why people can't donate, such as:-
However, if they then go on to recite a bitter Socialist Worker diatribe claiming the State should provide everything and that by raising funds for a charity just reinforces the Government's position of avoiding paying for stuff then, sorry, that is not on.
To start with, such a statement is either a) case of turrets where all they can spout is garbage b) they like the sound of their own voice but still only speak garbage c) they've heard/read someone else's view which happens to be garbage but it had some big words in itd) it's how they were brought up (religious/social/racial filter) e) they have been unsuccessful in a fundraising event due to their low popularity and this has left them embittered.
Whatever the reason behind such a statement it is actually similar to the filtered/blinkered views of many people brought up within a religion. Is there a touch of irony here? Many religions have charitable acts as a key characteristic. Note: this is neither a pop at or a justification of religion, just a statement of fact
Unfortunately for anyone indulging in such a rant only proves what most people think - that they are an utter vacuous wanker (excuse my, ahem, French)
I would certainly not enter such a discussion without forethought, instead I prefer to mull it over and respond in a measured and thoughtful way instead of spewing up lunch as a quickfire response.
Firstly, I'd like to express the view that a mixture of private charitable functions and Government managed organisations are required. Government can't possibly manage or provide everything. The budget deficit has been building up for years - adding more burden on to the State is simply not feasible.
And if it were to be decided that Government could raise taxes specifically to take on the burden of charity, the cost would be a lot greater than the £11.3 Billion raised because administration by the state would be a lot greater (charities rely on volunteers or low-paid staff).
So, the cost would probably be between £20-30 billion, so that could by up to £1150 more tax per year for the income tax payers. and who would be worse hit? The poor. So, claiming the Government should deliver everything - what a daft thing to say!
Okay, so in a Utopian world Governments could write a cheque and life-threatening diseases and poverty would be cured, Hospitals would have every piece of equipment required, and all them brave people who thought for our freedom from Hitler and other Fundamentalists weren't actually wounded, traumatised or killed. But that's not the case. We have massive public debts, and inefficient bodies (such as the NHS) that continue to overburden the taxpayer - adding extra tax burden on the public or increasing debt won't solve anything.
So, I think in this brief article I've surmised why Charities should be kept separate from Government and why anyone who may have spat an opinion to the contrary has not thought it through and is a plonker.
I certainly think Charities could improve their own organisations through shared administration and other means, but they deliver more independently than they could via Government. And if it was a cheque-writing Government with no concept of accountability even less would be delivered.
The British nation has always been big on charity. For a nation of high taxes, in the main most people still give to charity on a regular basis.
In 2007/8 charity donations peaked at £11.3 billion from the British public. Although it came down a bit in 2008/9 (still £10.6 billion) the figure for 2010 is expected to be close to the peak, and in 2011 it will probably be even higher.
I'm experiencing the generosity of my fellow citizens right now as I raise funds via a sponsored walk.
Of course, not everyone has been able to donate, but they have wished me well with the event and their good wishes are invaluable too. Indeed there are many valid reasons why people can't donate, such as:-
- Can't afford to - times are difficult and everyone's disposable income varies
- Recently donated to something else (as I said, we're a charitable bunch so there will always be someone you know fundraising)
- Against their beliefs/principles - your charity choice may not be everyone's cup of tea (e.g. not sure I'd donate if someone wanted to raise funds to build a statue of Gordon Brown!)
However, if they then go on to recite a bitter Socialist Worker diatribe claiming the State should provide everything and that by raising funds for a charity just reinforces the Government's position of avoiding paying for stuff then, sorry, that is not on.
To start with, such a statement is either a) case of turrets where all they can spout is garbage b) they like the sound of their own voice but still only speak garbage c) they've heard/read someone else's view which happens to be garbage but it had some big words in itd) it's how they were brought up (religious/social/racial filter) e) they have been unsuccessful in a fundraising event due to their low popularity and this has left them embittered.
Whatever the reason behind such a statement it is actually similar to the filtered/blinkered views of many people brought up within a religion. Is there a touch of irony here? Many religions have charitable acts as a key characteristic. Note: this is neither a pop at or a justification of religion, just a statement of fact
Unfortunately for anyone indulging in such a rant only proves what most people think - that they are an utter vacuous wanker (excuse my, ahem, French)
I would certainly not enter such a discussion without forethought, instead I prefer to mull it over and respond in a measured and thoughtful way instead of spewing up lunch as a quickfire response.
Firstly, I'd like to express the view that a mixture of private charitable functions and Government managed organisations are required. Government can't possibly manage or provide everything. The budget deficit has been building up for years - adding more burden on to the State is simply not feasible.
And if it were to be decided that Government could raise taxes specifically to take on the burden of charity, the cost would be a lot greater than the £11.3 Billion raised because administration by the state would be a lot greater (charities rely on volunteers or low-paid staff).
So, the cost would probably be between £20-30 billion, so that could by up to £1150 more tax per year for the income tax payers. and who would be worse hit? The poor. So, claiming the Government should deliver everything - what a daft thing to say!
So, what's good about money Charity instead of Government provision? well, here's some big hitters:-
- Participation by choice - if you don't want to donate to a particular charity that is your choice.
- A fairer "charity tax" - the poor don't have to donate, and the rich can donate as much as they like (whether they do or not is a different question)
- Fairer distribution - choose who you want funds to go to rather than a Government algorithm
- The virtue of participation - how good does it feel to volunteer at a charity shop, or to take part in a fundraiser? Flamin' great!
- Helps people achieve closure - if a loved one has died you want to help a particular cause and in doing so it helps you to move on whilst retaining a connection
- Localisation - donate locally and see the impact in your community
- Not subject to political whims!
- Helps causes that simply would not get Government funding - do you really think something like "make a wish" would ever get Government funding for what it does?
- Expertise in certain fields can develop without Government red-tape
- It enables companies to get involved in the community too
Okay, so in a Utopian world Governments could write a cheque and life-threatening diseases and poverty would be cured, Hospitals would have every piece of equipment required, and all them brave people who thought for our freedom from Hitler and other Fundamentalists weren't actually wounded, traumatised or killed. But that's not the case. We have massive public debts, and inefficient bodies (such as the NHS) that continue to overburden the taxpayer - adding extra tax burden on the public or increasing debt won't solve anything.
So, I think in this brief article I've surmised why Charities should be kept separate from Government and why anyone who may have spat an opinion to the contrary has not thought it through and is a plonker.
I certainly think Charities could improve their own organisations through shared administration and other means, but they deliver more independently than they could via Government. And if it was a cheque-writing Government with no concept of accountability even less would be delivered.
Wednesday 13 April 2011
Harrison's Walk
On 30th April/1st May I’m walking 46.3miles with a group of friends along Peddars Way in Norfolk to raise funds in memory of Harrison Nicholl, who died when he was only 3 days old in February 2010.
In the words of Harrison’s Mum, Claire, here’s why we're doing it:-
Quidenham Children's Hospice (EACH)
"Why" - Some of you may or may not have heard of them. They are a registered charity that cares for children and young people with life-threatening conditions and complex healthcare needs - They also offer bereavement support which we have been receiving since Harrison died and they have been absolutely wonderful. They rely on donations and they need £4million to deliver their services this year.
The Neo-Natal Intensive Care Unit at The Norfolk & Norwich Hospital.
"Why" - Harrison was cared for in the unit and we can not thank them enough for all of their care and attention, not just to Harrison but to myself and Simon (Harrison’s Dad). With their help and support we got to spend 3 precious days with him, we got to change his nappy, have lots of cuddles, give him his 1st bath, dress him in his first little outfit and we were even able to have him Christened.
On Harrison's final day with us we were taken to a private room where we were able to spend some time as a family on our own without all of the machines bleeping around us.
We want to raise money for a portable ventilator for this room. If the unit had one of these when Harrison was there we would have been able to spend more time with him on our own in private. I would love to help supply one of these machines so that any other parent's going through such an horrendous time are able to spend as much precious time with their little ones as possible.
50% of the funds raised will go to EACH and 50% to NNUH Neo-Natal Unit. We're only able to use the online fundraising pages for EACH but we're also collecting sponsorship via manual sponsorship forms so the money raised will be apportioned to make sure we have the 50/50 split.
If you'd like to donate please visit my fundraising page by clicking this link
In the words of Harrison’s Mum, Claire, here’s why we're doing it:-
Quidenham Children's Hospice (EACH)
"Why" - Some of you may or may not have heard of them. They are a registered charity that cares for children and young people with life-threatening conditions and complex healthcare needs - They also offer bereavement support which we have been receiving since Harrison died and they have been absolutely wonderful. They rely on donations and they need £4million to deliver their services this year.
The Neo-Natal Intensive Care Unit at The Norfolk & Norwich Hospital.
"Why" - Harrison was cared for in the unit and we can not thank them enough for all of their care and attention, not just to Harrison but to myself and Simon (Harrison’s Dad). With their help and support we got to spend 3 precious days with him, we got to change his nappy, have lots of cuddles, give him his 1st bath, dress him in his first little outfit and we were even able to have him Christened.
On Harrison's final day with us we were taken to a private room where we were able to spend some time as a family on our own without all of the machines bleeping around us.
We want to raise money for a portable ventilator for this room. If the unit had one of these when Harrison was there we would have been able to spend more time with him on our own in private. I would love to help supply one of these machines so that any other parent's going through such an horrendous time are able to spend as much precious time with their little ones as possible.
50% of the funds raised will go to EACH and 50% to NNUH Neo-Natal Unit. We're only able to use the online fundraising pages for EACH but we're also collecting sponsorship via manual sponsorship forms so the money raised will be apportioned to make sure we have the 50/50 split.
If you'd like to donate please visit my fundraising page by clicking this link
Sunday 10 April 2011
Feedback
One of the most annoying things about eBay is there is no comeuppance for buyers who do not leave feedback. I recently sold an item to someone who I later found out had not left feedback for anyone for 2 years, yet this blighter was a frequent buyer on eBay.
So, whilst this 23yr old (I'm guessing) job-shy bloke has built his feedback score, everyone who has sent an item to him in the North East have not received the positive feedback they deserve. It's sorely tempting to email eBay suggesting this individual is not playing by the book but I doubt it will make a difference.
Instead, I will simply check future buyers and if they have similar attitudes then I will not to leave feedback for them until positive feedback is received.
I will also block this individual from making future purchases from me. What goes around comes around.
On a positive note, Albion beat this bloke's hometown team 3-2 to move us towards saftety, and leave the Mackems looking over their shoulders towards the footy elite trapdoor. Get in!!!!!
So, whilst this 23yr old (I'm guessing) job-shy bloke has built his feedback score, everyone who has sent an item to him in the North East have not received the positive feedback they deserve. It's sorely tempting to email eBay suggesting this individual is not playing by the book but I doubt it will make a difference.
Instead, I will simply check future buyers and if they have similar attitudes then I will not to leave feedback for them until positive feedback is received.
I will also block this individual from making future purchases from me. What goes around comes around.
On a positive note, Albion beat this bloke's hometown team 3-2 to move us towards saftety, and leave the Mackems looking over their shoulders towards the footy elite trapdoor. Get in!!!!!
Wednesday 6 April 2011
Kick it up a notch
Recently I've been listening to classic New Order tracks - a lot!
So, I've posted the timeless True Faith. Why choose this well known track instead of publicising a lesser known tune? Well, George Michael recently released a terrible cover of it (but it was to raise money for Comic Relief so some goof came from it) so I chose this track to remind everyone what a superb song it is.
So, I've posted the timeless True Faith. Why choose this well known track instead of publicising a lesser known tune? Well, George Michael recently released a terrible cover of it (but it was to raise money for Comic Relief so some goof came from it) so I chose this track to remind everyone what a superb song it is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)